The Thai
elite can’t win elections so they thought they’d try playing another game: Snakes and Ladders.
The Thai
elite couldn’t win that game either.
For those
who don’t know about the traditional board game of Snakes and Ladders, it is
played between two or more players on a game board having numbered,
gridded squares. A number of "ladders" and "snakes" are
pictured on the board, each connecting two specific board squares. The object
of the game is to navigate one's game piece, according to die rolls,
from the start (bottom square) to the finish (top square). Along the way, players will find ladders to
help them advance (representing good acts) and snakes which will cause them to
move backwards (representing slides toward evil).
So ladders
are good and snakes are bad in this game.
On November
14th, government officials prepare ladders to act as a potential get away exit
at a wall near Parliament in case the neo-fascist mob known as Pitak Siam are
able to surround the compound.
Preparedness
is a good thing so Phue Thai receives ladders.
Overthrowing a
democratically elected government is a bad thing so the traditional Thai elite receive
snakes.
Phue Thai
wins again and fascism craps out.
Perhaps the
Thai elite might have better luck in the political chess game known as the
censure debate which will be held in a few days. This is very doubtful as all games have
morals; which is why the fascists in Thailand will never truly win anything.
It would
appear that General Boonlert Kaewprasit, leader of the Pitak Siam group, is in
a hasty retreat. Only a few weeks ago he was infamously calling for a coup to
topple the democratically elected government and to place democratic rule in
the "deep-freeze" for five years. Thailand would be governed by an appointed
government. It's the complete opposite of the Arab Spring protests where people demanded democracy from dictatorships. Consider it the "Thai Winter" where people demand dictatorship from democracy.
"If a
coup did take place, an interim government would be set up. If this was not
acceptable to other countries, we could close the country. I don't know for how
many years, but the closure should remain until all the bad politicians have
been driven away. I have never seen a good politician. Soldiers are needed to
take care of the country." - Gen Boonlert, October 31, 2012
Then on
November 16 after a severe mocking by pro-democratic groups and other right
minded people, the general stepped back a bit.
"We will
have a period of caretakers in control. It's like basketball. If there is an
accident, can't we have a short timeout of 2-3 minutes? If it's on the time
scale of politics, it will maybe be 1 year 2 years 3 years or 5 years, then we
can have elections again. If it's just one year [without elections] such as in
2549, it will be ruined because as soon as 'he' leaves he'll be back." -
Gen Boonlert, November 16, 2012
Two days
later, the general was totally denying everything.
"I've
never called for the country to be closed or frozen for a period. I only want to
stop corrupt politicians." - Gen Boonlert, November 18, 2012
But the
general has gathered all his fascist friends to help him rally this weekend for
a military coup. Of course, front and
center is the yellow-shirt People’s Alliance for Democracy (PAD). Right behind them is the multi-colored-shirt gang
led by Tul Sitthisomwong. The list goes on and on and is quite impressive: Peace-Loving
Thais group led by Kanchanee Walayasevi, PAD’s Chamlong Srimuang’s Dhamma Army, etc...
One of the
latest groups that say they’ll be attending is the New Politics Party led by
former PAD co-leader Somsak Kosaisuk.
They’re such a neo-fascist group that their logo is a “blinged up” swastika.
Personally,
I think these people really do want to “freeze” Thailand. If they didn’t then why does Somsak resemble
the snowman narrator from the seasonal Christmas television classic “Rudolph
the Red Nose Reindeer?”
Then there’s
Prasong Soonsiri, who probably was alive during the last climatic ice age. That
pipe looks very familiar…
And it is
the face of Channel 7’s reporter, Somjit Nawakruasunthorn.
Somjit Nawakruasunthorn
Nearly
every day, the Deputy Prime Minister of Thailand, Chalerm Yubamrung, holds a
small, informal press conference. Usually these question and answer sessions are
humdrum and uneventful but the one held on Nov 15, 2012 was quite entertaining
and illustrates the typical media bias there is against the current government
there… specifically, the bias shown by Channel 7’s reporter, Somjit
Nawakruasunthorn.
The topic of the questioning was the security preparations for
handling the next Pitak Siam rally on Nov 24-25 at the Royal Plaza. Mr Chalerm was
simply trying to inform Somjit that a political party was behind the rally was
the main threat.
Which party, she asked?
"The one that loses elections," he answered, clearly referring to the
opposition Democrats who haven’t won a national election in over 20 years. Clearly Somjit is not the sharpest tool in the tool shed.
When she persisted in her questions, challenging him to
provide evidence, he pointed out to her that she was a Democrat supporter,
causing her to misunderstand the situation and the government's progress in dealing
with it.
The reporter said she could sue him for the remark. Mr Chalerm
said he had done nothing wrong.
‘‘I’m just saying that you sympathize with that party. There is
nothing wrong with that,’’ Mr Chalerm said. ‘‘Sue me if you want,’’ he added.
Somjit retorted: ‘‘If your calling me sympathetic to that party is not defamatory,
would calling your servitude to Thaksin Shinawatra amount to
defamation?’’
The reporter then challenged Mr Chalerm to file a police complaint against
her.
Here’s the video of the event:
Now I don’t
think we need to bring this to any Thai court.
Why waste their time? Besides, everyone
knows Thai courts are both incompetent and corrupt. I will be more than happy to be the judge here…
and know that I don’t just pass judgment.
I lay on the horn and flip it the bird.
Is Somjit
sympathetic to the Democrat Party? Let’s
look at the evidence.
Somjit has admitted that she participated in the PAD’s terrorist takeover of
Suvarnabhumi International Airport in 2008. This terrorist action was supported
by the Democrats which helped bus in participants.
One
Democrat Party leader who openly supported the PAD is Korn Chatikavanij. In
2008, Korn said the following in the Bangkok Post after the
siege of the NBT station by the PAD:
“Let’s be
clear I am a PAD sympathizer. I attended the very first Thammasat
“seminar” organized by Sondhi Limthongkul back in 2005. I remembered thinking
at the time that something special was happening.”
Of course,
one can read more about the Democrat Party Bankster, Korn, from a syrupy book
written by an obvious ass kissing author, none other than Somjit herself.
Somjit's Book About Korn
Somjit has also
written two other books practically worshipping former PM Abhisit Vejjajiva, the most
recent one which Abhisit helped promote with personal appearances at book
signings. It must have been quite a feat writing these books while her tongue
was half-way down the backside of Abhisit’s trousers.
Somjit's Two Books About Abhisit
So I think
it is fairly obvious that Somjit is a Democrat Party sympathizer which
automatically makes her uninformed and ignorant in my judgment.
Is Somjit
biased in her reporting? Again, let’s be fair and look at some evidence.
In her
first month after being taking office, democratically elected Prime Minster
Yingluck Shinawatra refused to answer questions at a press conference from
Somjit. The first question the PM refused to answer was: "Do you ever
think of doing something for the country or the people sometimes or not?"
That question was preceded by this one: "Do you think the cabinet is
uglier than the PM?"
There is a
difference between asking hard questions in an interview and asking questions
intended to put someone on the spot and embarrass them in public with the
cameras rolling. Journalistic ethics say the later is not acceptable
practice, in Thailand or anywhere else. Obviously, we are not dealing with
Barbara Walters here.
But this doesn’t mean Somjit is biased against the Pheu Thai led government.
She’s only biased if she doesn’t ask similar type of unethical questions of the opposition Democrats. However, all I could find is "soft and sugary" questions to the Democrats coming from Somjit. I wouldn’t be surprised that she gets cavities while interviewing
Democrats, which is really saying something based upon her enormous set of “chompers.”
And come to think of it, I thought I spotted some tooth anomaly in one of her photographs.
Closer inspection reveals a possible small cavity on the upper first molar.
So I think
it is very fair to say that Somjit is a biased propaganda outlet and has prostituted
herself to the service of the Democrat Party and other right wing reactionaries
who are desperately trying to sleaze their way back into power. There! I said it. Sue me.
But there
is a point to be made. Somjit accuses Chalerm of corruption… of being the
servant of Thaksin Shinawatra. And many people feel that Thailand can’t exist
as a democracy because of the extreme corruption there.
But although
corruption is a scourge, it is not as big of a barrier to democracy as the unethical
behavior that has become commonplace in the Thai news media. Journalism is a necessary piece of the
democratic structure itself, making reporters “democracy’s stewards”. Public enlightenment is the foundation of
democracy and the forerunner of justice. The duty of all journalists is to
further those ends by seeking truth and providing a fair and comprehensive
account of events and issues.
Below are a
few snippets from the code of ethics from the Society of Professional
Journalists that I'm sure Somjit or anyone at Channel 7 (or even anyone from “The Nation”) never bothered to read or embrace (of course, I doubt they're members):
Act Independently
Journalists should be free of obligation
to any interest other than the public's right to know.
Journalists should:
* Avoid conflicts of interest, real or perceived.
* Remain free of associations and activities that may compromise integrity or damage credibility.
* Refuse gifts, favors, fees, free travel and special treatment, and shun
secondary employment, political involvement, public office and service in
community organizations if they compromise journalistic integrity.
* Deny favored treatment to advertisers and special interests and resist their
pressure to influence news coverage.
* Encourage the public to voice grievances against the news media.
* Admit mistakes and correct them promptly.
* Expose unethical practices of journalists and the news media.
* Abide by the same high standards to which they hold others.
------------------------------
The expectations are set. We have to hold them to it.
Deputy PM Chalerm is holding Channel 7 to it. He has stated that he will not answer questions from the media if a Channel 7 reporter is among the interviewing group.
Professional integrity is the cornerstone of a journalist's credibility. Somjit Nawakruasunthorn never had any.
Retired
Thai General and extreme royalist fruitcake Boonlert Kaewprasit has goose stepped
into the political spotlight and possibly something else.
General Boonlert Kaewprasit
As the organizer of a pro-military coup
movement, he has his fascist crew called Pitak Siam leading a parade of
virtually all the ugly Nazi-like groups in Thailand against the democratically
elected government.
These
groups include the Group of 40 Senators, Dr. Tul’s multi-colored group/Network
of Citizen Volunteers Protecting the Land, the Siam Sammakhi nutjobs, Network
of Monarchy Protection Volunteers, and even Santi Asoke’s Dhamma Army. I
suppose we can call this a “movement” if we associate the word “bowel” with it.
General
Boonlert's latest numbskull plan is to try to mobilize at least 1 million
people to gather at the Royal Plaza next weekend in an attempt to topple the
government by triggering a military coup.
Why do these
idiots bother to organize and participate in mass demonstrations? After all, they can vote (although they don’t
believe in voting), and public opinion surveys convey their views on public
issues. A mass demonstration symbolizes something more than popular opinion to
governments, to other citizens and to the demonstrators themselves. When
citizens assemble, they signal an intensity of commitment, a tangible
collective strength that is absent in the voting booth or on the poll-taker’s
clipboard and the more “massive” the demonstration, the more intensive the
signal.
With
apologies to the Military, Democrats, and the Privy Council, the most massive
and wackiest of all the fascist groups in Thailand is the People’s Alliance for
Democracy (PAD). They have “opened the floodgates”… or to be more sensitive to
the Thai flood victims last year and more descriptive of the PAD followers, they have
“opened the cattle gates.”
The Grand Poobahs
of the PAD have cancelled the group’s political activities (hate speeches,
terrorism, propaganda, etc…) for the weekend of Nov 24-25 to allow its
supporters to join Boonlert’s pro-coup rally planned by the Pitak Siam group. Maj-Gen Chamlong Srimuang, a PAD core leader
and fanatical nut job, announced that PAD leaders will not take part in the
Pitak Siam rally, but will give it moral support and that “rank and file
supporters could take part at their own discretion, as is their right under the
constitution.”
I think the
irony is lost on the PAD. Even though their name suggests that they are “for
democracy”, they support military coups against a democratically elected
government. They’re proud to exercise their constitutional right to protest,
albeit to overthrow the same constitution which gives them that right.
Nevertheless,
even with the addition of the PAD members, will this be enough paste-eating morons
to make Boonlert’s fascist dream come true of rallying a million pro coup
supporters? Does Boonlert have a
snowball’s chance in Bangkok that there will be 1 million people at the Royal
Plaza?
One million
people is a “shoot the moon” number by Boonlert and is simply unreasonable. For one thing, it’s physically impossible to
cram that many idiots in an area the size of the Royal plaza. Boonlert is obviously
unaware of how much space is required to hold 1 million or even 100,000
demonstrators.
Firstly, he
needs to know the area of the space he plans to have his fascist rally. The
Royal Plaza does look like a large area. Of course, there’s the large King Rama
V Equestrian Statue which takes up some space (BTW, for those "looky loos" who
will attend: if there is PAD around you should
avoid the area near the statue based upon past history). There is also the need
for some of the area to be taken up by a stage and a segregated VIP area. Also,
some of the area will be taken up by things like medical stations and “PAD
think tanks” (in the US, we more commonly refer to them as “porta potties”).
PAD Think Tanks
I’m going
to be generous, though, and state that the Royal Plaza offers an area of about 140,000
square feet for a mob (yes, I looked it up).
Bangkok's Royal Plaza
Next, he
needs to know about crowd density. Near
the front of a rally, people may stand shoulder to-shoulder and belly-to-buttocks.
One person per 2 square feet is about the density of a packed elevator or sky
train car, leaving hardly any space to wriggle through. Packed elevator rides
are mercifully brief, but rallies last much longer. People shift their weight,
twist and turn, sit and even walk around.
Further
away from the stage, 2.5 square feet per person is akin to each person standing
on the front page of “The Nation” newspaper. Toward the side and rear edges of a gathering,
5 square feet per person gives each the equivalent of two pages of “The Nation”
newspaper, allowing slow passage through the crowd with repeated apologies. On the
gathering’s margins, 10 square feet per person allows passage by zigzagging
through at a measured pace without touching anyone.
The
following table gives values for the “mob” capacity of some familiar spaces.
So even if
the mob at the rally were crammed in close together and stood more or less
perfectly still, they would at best only hit only 56,000. And if these fascists think that they can fit
one million of their ilk in the Royal Plaza then they must have their head up each
other’s asses.
Wait a
minute!!! "Heads up each other's asses." Now there’s an idea to fit more fascist yellow shirts into Royal Plaza by "going vertical" and increasing the number of people which can fit in a confined area.
These Thai generals may be smarter than I give them credit for... Not!
Earlier
this week the democratically elected Prime Minister of Thailand, Yingluck
Shinawatra, was on an official visit to the United Kingdom where she was given
an audience with Queen Elizabeth.
“It was a
great honor to be granted such an audience by the Queen of England,” the PM
said. Speaking on behalf of all Thais, she congratulated Queen Elizabeth on her
Diamond Jubilee, marking 60 years on the throne.
This must
make the former PM, Abhisit Vejjajiva, very jealous. Abhisit, who was not democratically elected as
PM but rather was installed into that office by the Thai military, visited the
UK during his term but wasn’t granted a royal audience. And he’s even a British citizen!
I doubt the
Queen grants too many audiences to heads of government who murder their own
people protesting wanting elections.
Abhisit
must not be feeling too happy nowadays. The International Criminal Court
Prosecutor, Fatou Bensouda,was in Bangkok recently talking to
the Foreign Minister about the possibility of the ICC looking into the 2010 massacre
of innocent civilians by the Abhisit regime.
He was
also found recently to have evaded the mandatory Thai military draft and was stripped of
his fake rank.
Perhaps,
Abhisit could go over to Prem Tinsulanonda’s house where they could dress up and
play “meet the Queen”.
The Royal
Turf Club of Thailand is a horse racing stadium. But on Sunday, October 27th,
there wasn’t an equine event scheduled. Instead
it was more of a bovine event led by a group of fascists calling for yet
another coup in Thailand.
Although protests
like this are nauseating to me, I do believe in free speech. I have always felt that even the most
repugnant ideas should receive the same freedom of expression as more accepted
ones. And freedom of speech should be
less a "free marketplace" of ideas than it is a playground. And
the best way to dispense with unpopular ideas is to let them roam free, so they
can have their asses kicked up and down the jungle gym by the cool ideas.
And healthy
democracies usually handle these types of protests. Unfortunately, democracy hasn’t been healthy
in Thailand since the last coup six years ago. That one didn’t work out too well, I’m not sure why these bozos think a
new one would.
The rally
was organized by the newest fascist group in Thailand called Pitak Siam, or
Protecting Siam, led by retired General and fruitcake Boonlert Kaewprasit.
And true to
the old saying, “fascists of a feather flock together (and I'd like to tell Boonlert to get the flock out of here).” There were many other anti-democracy
groups represented. A New Mandala article stated that several second generation
People’s Alliance for Democracy leaders, members of the Group of 40 Senators,
General Pathompong Kesornsuk, Dr. Tul, and several groups allied with the Siam
Sammakhi network, such as Boworn Yasinthorn, leader of the “Network of
Monarchy Protection Volunteers” were in attendance. Santi Asoke’s Dhamma Army even
organized the food (vegetarian pa thang ko shaped like swastikas).
And guess
who also attended? None other than Prasong Soonsiri, organizer of the last
coup.
He seems to
pop up at all kinds of fascist events.
If we go back a few years, we can see him with Sondhi Limthongkul in 2009 when they launched their so-called political party.
Who knows
what other fascist events we may find Prasong at if we looked hard enough?
Oh
dear. Let’s go way, way, way, back and see if
we find him.
Just as I
suspected! One dinosaur unfortunately survived extinction – Tyrannosaurus Sux.