The State
Department released its 2012 human trafficking report on Tuesday and for the
third straight year Thailand was placed on the Tier 2 Watch List. But there is
more to this than meets the eye.
The Trafficking in
Persons (TIP) Report is the U.S. Government’s principal diplomatic tool to
engage foreign governments on human trafficking. It is also the world’s most
comprehensive resource of governmental anti-human trafficking efforts and one
of the good things the U.S. Government actually does in the world. I have
pulled out the part of the 2012 report on Thailand and made it available here.
The entire world report can be found on the U.S. Department of State website
here.
The TIP report is mandated by the Trafficking Victims Prevention Act (TVPA) passed by the U.S Congress in 2000. In the TIP
Report (released annually in June), each country is placed onto one of three
tiers based on the extent of their governments’ efforts to comply with the “minimum
standards for the elimination of trafficking” found in Section 108 of the TVPA.
A GUIDE TO THE TIERS
TIER 1
Countries whose governments fully comply with the TVPA’s minimum standards.
Countries whose governments fully comply with the TVPA’s minimum standards.
TIER 2
Countries whose governments do not fully comply with the TVPA’s minimum standards, but are making significant efforts to bring themselves into compliance with those standards.
Countries whose governments do not fully comply with the TVPA’s minimum standards, but are making significant efforts to bring themselves into compliance with those standards.
TIER 2 WATCH LIST
Countries whose governments do not fully comply with the TVPA’s minimum standards, but are making significant efforts to bring themselves into compliance with those standards
Countries whose governments do not fully comply with the TVPA’s minimum standards, but are making significant efforts to bring themselves into compliance with those standards
AND:
a) The absolute number of victims of
severe forms of trafficking is very significant or is significantly increasing;
b) There is a failure to provide
evidence of increasing efforts to combat severe forms of trafficking in
persons from the previous year; or
c) The determination that a country is making
significant efforts to bring itself into compliance with minimum standards was
based on commitments by the country to take additional future steps over
the next year.
TIER 3
Countries whose governments do not fully comply with the minimum standards and are not making significant efforts to do so.
Countries whose governments do not fully comply with the minimum standards and are not making significant efforts to do so.
The TVPA lists additional factors through
which to determine whether a country should be on Tier 2 (or Tier 2 Watch List)
versus Tier 3. First, the extent to which the country is a country of origin,
transit, or destination for severe forms of trafficking. Second, the extent to
which the country’s government does not comply with the TVPA’s minimum
standards and, in particular, the extent to which officials or government
employees have been complicit in severe forms of trafficking. And third,
reasonable measures required bringing the government into compliance with the
minimum standards in light of the government’s resources and capabilities to
address and eliminate severe forms of trafficking in persons.
As I’ve reported before, after Thailand’s military made Abhisit Vejjajiva the Prime Minister, Thailand’s
Tier ranking slipped from being Tier 2 previously under the democratically
elected PPP led government to being on the Tier 2 Watch List for 2010 and 2011.
This consecutive
Tier 2 Watch List ranking is important in that in 2008,
the William Wilberforce Trafficking Victims Protection Reauthorization Act
included a provision (Section 107) that any country that has been ranked
Tier 2 Watch List for two consecutive years and that would otherwise be ranked
Tier 2 Watch List for the next year will instead be ranked Tier 3 for the next
year.
And if a country is ranked as Tier 3 then
several penalties could be levied. Penalties such as the withholding or
withdrawing of non humanitarian, nontrade-related foreign assistance, the
withholding of funding for government employees’ participation in educational
and cultural exchange programs, and U.S. opposition to assistance (except for
humanitarian, trade-related, and certain development-related assistance) from
international financial institutions such as the International Monetary Fund
(IMF) and the World Bank.
So, by being
placed on the Tier 2 Watch List and allowing human trafficking to flourish in
Thailand for two consecutive years, Abhisit not only embarrassed the Kingdom
but he put the country at risk of economic penalties.
However, Section
107 of the 2008 Act also provided a waiver of the consecutive Tier 2 Watch List
rule.
“The President may
waive the application of clause for up to 2 years if the President determines,
and reports credible evidence to the Committee on Foreign Relations of the
Senate and the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives,
that such a waiver is justified because - (I) the country has a written plan to
begin making significant efforts to bring itself into compliance with the
minimum standards for the elimination of trafficking; (II) the plan, if implemented, would
constitute making such significant efforts; and (III) the country is devoting
sufficient resources to implement the plan. ”
This is how
Thailand received another Tier 2 Watch List ranking and not the otherwise
required downgrade to the Tier 3 ranking. The government led by PM Yingluck Shinawatra provided a written plan that, if implemented, would
constitute making significant efforts to meet the minimum standards for the
elimination of trafficking and is devoting sufficient resources to implement
that plan. Her government also continued implementation of its human
trafficking law and conducted awareness-raising activities on human
trafficking.
Also,
during Yingluck’s first month in office, UN Special Rapporteur on trafficking
in persons, Joy Ngozi Ezeilo, was invited to visit. In a press statement following her visit, the
UN Special Rapporteur on trafficking in persons noted, among other shortcomings,
weak enforcement of the country’s legal antitrafficking framework, inadequate
efforts to address trafficking of migrants, endemic corruption among law enforcement
officials, and a systemic failure to properly identify victims and protect their
rights and safety. Yingluck’s government agreed to fund and open five national
verification centers for Burmese migrant workers inside Thailand. These centers
opened in late April 2012.
Although much more
progress is needed, the democratically elected government led by PM Yingluck
Shinawatra has at least started tackling the problem of human trafficking in
Thailand exacerbated by a military installed government led by Abhisit
Vejjajiva. Under his regime, Thailand’s image in the world’s eyes were
tarnished. Instead of focusing government resources insanely on apprehending
Thaksin Shinawatra and staying in power, Abhisit should have addressed the
needs of Thailand’s citizens – but, of course, Thailand’s citizens weren’t the
ones Abhisit had to report to.
Human trafficking should to be a number one priority for any human rights based NGO in Thailand. The problem is massive throughout Southeast Asia and endangers the lives of both the trafficked persons and the traffickers who are recruited unwittingly or who agree out of desperation for money. The Thai government should be applauded for making this a top issue, and I hope that the commission will be able to show that it is being effective after each six month review. Hopefully, the public and governments will stop seeing these people as criminals and start to perceive them as individuals in need of support and ways to earn a living legally and fairly. Thailand must continue to work side-by-side with other countries in Asia to ensure that steps to a solution are put in place and carried out.
ReplyDelete